SCIWRENCH
TOOLS FOR MINDS THAT EXPLORE
A five-part interactive journey

Ancestry Decoder

What does a genomic ancestry result actually tell you—and what can it never tell you?

Chapter 1 · The report

Meet sample SW–001

A fictional ancestry company analyzed this person's autosomal DNA and returned the following estimate.

Your ancestry compositionModel update: 4.2
Iberian42%
Indigenous American29%
West African18%
Northern European11%
Pause before interpreting: these percentages look exact, but what was actually measured?
Chapter 2 · Interpret one percentage

What does “42% Iberian” mean?

Choose the interpretation you think is most scientifically accurate.

Chapter 3 · From genome to label

How was the estimate created?

The company does not find “Iberian DNA” written inside the genome. It performs a chain of comparisons.

STEP 1Genome

SW–001 provides a set of genetic variants sampled across the chromosomes.

STEP 2Segments

The model examines many overlapping regions rather than treating the genome as one block.

STEP 3Comparisons

Each segment is compared statistically with DNA from people in reference groups.

STEP 4Population labels

The closest model-supported similarities are summarized as percentages and names.

The DNA is biological. The segments, comparisons, boundaries, and population names are parts of an analytical model.
Chapter 4 · Simplified educational model

Change reference coverage

The genome remains locked. Change how well each population is represented and observe the effects on label resolution and uncertainty.

🔒 Fixed

Sample SW–001 and its underlying simulated ancestry never change during this experiment.

↕ Manipulated

Reference coverage: a teaching summary of sample number, diversity, quality, and suitability—not raw sample count alone.

Read the model output

Specific labels require suitable reference coverage; weaker coverage produces broader labels and wider uncertainty.

Same DNA • Different resolution
Resolution of the displayed DNA classification

The displayed ranges are illustrative, not calculated confidence intervals. Each population range is considered separately, so range endpoints are not expected to sum to 100%.

Compare the last four analyses

Each frame preserves its reference-coverage profile and resulting level of resolution. New analyses replace the oldest frame.

Chapter 5 · Explain the result

Build a scientifically accurate interpretation

Complete the sentence using what you discovered.

In this analysis, approximately 42% of were classified as the company's .

“In this analysis, the model estimated that approximately 42% of the analyzed autosomal DNA was most consistent with genetic patterns in its Iberian reference population. This suggests genetic connections to populations represented by those samples, but it does not identify the exact number, identity, culture, or residence of my ancestors.”

✓ What the result can indicate

  • Genetic similarity to sampled reference populations
  • Possible connections to populations represented in the database
  • Patterns that may support other genealogical evidence

× What the result cannot establish

  • The identity or location of every ancestor
  • An exact percentage of ancestors from a population
  • Nationality, culture, ethnicity, or community membership
  • One permanently correct ancestry percentage